Report highlights impact of emergency departments missing or delaying ‘time critical’ medication for patients with existing conditions
We’ve published a report examining the case of a patient who did not receive time critical Parkinso…
Read moreWe collect a range of evidence as part of our investigations, to help us understand concerns about patient safety and to produce our findings and safety recommendations.
These are the sources of evidence that are usually included in our investigations:
We analyse our evidence using a range of methods that adopt a human factors and ergonomics approach (sometimes referred to as ‘safety science’). Human factors is an established scientific discipline used in many other safety critical industries, such as aviation, rail transport and nuclear power stations.
We use practical and academic models and tools to help us better understand how patient safety incidents occur. This allows us to adopt a systems perspective that does not find blame or liability with individuals or organisations.
Common methods and tools used in our investigations to help develop our findings and safety recommendations include:
Our investigation reports include information on the specific methods we have used to collect and analyse our evidence.
The organisations and contacts we have made are listed in our investigation reports to demonstrate the range of views we have taken within a specific investigation.
As part of our consultation process we share the report with a range of national stakeholders on consultation before we publish our final report. Our reports do not name individuals or local healthcare organisations but such sharing allows for further check and challenge of evidence and findings that would be included in our final report, including by patient and family representative groups.
The national stakeholders we regularly consult includes:
It’s important that our investigations are informed by expert opinion. This helps us better understand patient safety concerns and allows us to produce robust findings, safety recommendations and other safety learning.
Our investigations always speak with patients, families, healthcare staff and national organisations to take evidence and gain insight across multiple groups and help us check and challenge our investigations from different perspectives.
Sometimes we also identify the need for more specific subject matter advice to help us gain additional knowledge and insight into a specific patient safety concern. We can identify subject matter advisors in several ways, including engagement with professional bodies, academic institutions, voluntary and charitable groups, or other national organisations.
Subject matter advisors may include:
When a designated subject matter advisor contributes to a patient safety investigation this is stated in our investigation report and they are also bound by the legal requirement of protected disclosure.
We’ve published a report examining the case of a patient who did not receive time critical Parkinso…
Read moreThe leadership team of the Swedish Accident Investigation Authority compare their capacity for heal…
Read moreOur latest report raises concerns over female prisoners privacy and dignity after an investigation …
Read more