Unplanned delayed removal of ureteric stents

From the investigation: Unplanned delayed removal of ureteric stents

Recommendation date:

Safety recommendation

It is recommended that the British Association of Urological Surgeons encourages members to include information in discharge letters and other communication sent to GPs and patients regarding patients’ stent status, potential complications and the possibility of a retained stent.

Response:

We agree with this recommendation, and we would encourage that information regarding stent insertion and follow up is detailed clearly in the operative record. We have concerns that discharge information may already be long and complex, and information regarding stents is only one aspect that may need to be communicated to the GP. Due to variance in hospital IT systems, it is impossible to implement a digital “flag” which will be applied uniformly the NHS.

As a minimum standard, we feel that GPs should be made aware of the following information on discharge letters/summaries:

  • the reason for the insertion of the J-J stent
  • the intended stent dwell time and whether it is intended that it will be removed or changed.

We would suggest that all discharge information should be copied to patients and/or their carers. An example of a standardised discharge pro-forma that could be sent to GPs.

Time will be needed for busy GPs to ensure that this information is read and understood, and education programmes will be needed to help GP practices appreciate the similarities in symptoms of UTI and those that might be more directly attributable to a JJ stent.

Urinalysis (ideally formal microbiological culture rather than dipstick analysis) should be encouraged before patients are started on empirical antibiotics, unless they are febrile or otherwise systemically unwell.

Response received on 12 December 2022.

Back to safety recommendations log